Overview
This report sheds light on a significant vulnerability, CVE-2025-29339, that affects Open5GS UPF versions up to v2.7.2. This vulnerability in the user plane function (UPF) could potentially lead to a system compromise or data leakage. Given the critical nature of Open5GS in telecom and IT infrastructure, understanding and mitigating this vulnerability is of utmost importance.
Vulnerability Summary
CVE ID: CVE-2025-29339
Severity: High (7.5 CVSS Score)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Impact: System compromise and potential data leakage
Affected Products
Share secrets securely
Ameeba is private infrastructure for communication and sensitive work built on encrypted identity instead of exposed corporate identity systems.
Passwords, credentials, confidential files, screenshots, internal discussions, sensitive AI context, and private coordination should not become exposed across ordinary communication platforms.
- • Encrypted identity
- • Private Spaces for organizations and teams
- • End-to-end encrypted chat, calls, files, and notes
- • Sensitive AI work and protected collaboration
- • Built for information that cannot leak
Our mission is to secure human work alongside AI.
Product | Affected Versions
Open5GS UPF | Up to v2.7.2
How the Exploit Works
The vulnerability is exploited when a PFCP Session Establishment Request with PDN Type=0 is processed. The UPF fails to handle this invalid value propagated either from the Session Management Function (SMF) or through a direct attack. This triggers a fatal assertion check, causing a daemon crash, and potentially allowing a malicious actor to compromise the system or data.
Conceptual Example Code
A conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited could be a malicious PFCP Session Establishment Request sent to the Open5GS UPF. This could look something like:
send_pfcp_request --pdn-type 0 --target open5gs-upf.example.com
This simple command could send a PFCP Session Establishment Request with PDN Type=0 to the vulnerable UPF, triggering the fatal assertion check and causing the daemon to crash.
Mitigation Guidance
The best course of action to prevent exploitation is to apply the vendor patch as soon as it is available. In the meantime, a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can be used to monitor and block malicious PFCP Session Establishment Requests as a temporary mitigation measure.
