Author: Ameeba

Overview

A significant vulnerability has been identified in the SureTriggers: All-in-One Automation Platform plugin for WordPress. This vulnerability, designated as CVE-2025-3102, primarily impacts websites that have the plugin installed, activated, and not configured with an API key. Its severity is underscored by the potential for unauthenticated attackers to exploit this loophole to create administrative accounts, thereby gaining unauthorized control over the target website. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive overview of this vulnerability, its potential impact, and guidance on how to mitigate its risks.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-3102
Severity: High (CVSS: 8.1)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Impact: Unauthorized creation of administrator accounts, potential system compromise or data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

SureTriggers: All-in-One Automation Platform | Up to and including 1.0.78

How the Exploit Works

The vulnerability lies in the ‘autheticate_user’ function of the SureTriggers plugin. A missing empty value check on the ‘secret_key’ value makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass the normal authentication process. By sending a particular request to the server, a hacker can exploit this flaw to create an administrator account without providing the correct credentials.

Conceptual Example Code

The following is a conceptual example of how this vulnerability might be exploited. This is a hypothetical HTTP POST request that could be sent to the server:

POST /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=authenticate_user HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "secret_key": "" }

In this example, the “secret_key” value is left empty, exploiting the lack of an empty value check and potentially leading to the unauthorized creation of an administrator account.

Mitigation Guidance

To mitigate the risks associated with this vulnerability, users of the SureTriggers: All-in-One Automation Platform plugin are advised to apply the vendor patch. If a patch is not immediately available or deployable, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can provide temporary mitigation. Additionally, users are urged to always configure their plugins with an API key to improve their security posture and resist such types of vulnerabilities.

A Paradigm Shift in Cybersecurity

In the past, the cybersecurity landscape was dominated by a few elite companies, often referred to as “unicorns” due to their exceptional skills and capabilities. However, the cybersecurity landscape has dramatically evolved and the need for a more comprehensive and diverse approach has become evident. Today, rather than relying on a single unicorn, the industry needs a “herd of horses” – a strong, coordinated group of professionals who can work together to address the multifaceted challenges in cybersecurity. The urgency of this shift cannot be understated, given the increasing sophistication and frequency of cyber threats.

The Changing Landscape of Cyber Threats

The rise of digital transformation, coupled with the global pandemic, has significantly broadened the attack surface for cybercriminals. They are no longer targeting just large corporations or governments; small businesses, healthcare institutions, and even individuals have become potential victims. The stakes have never been higher as these attacks can lead to massive financial losses, reputational damage, and even risks to national security.

Potential Risks and Industry Implications

The lack of a coordinated defense strategy can have severe consequences. For businesses, a single successful cyberattack can result in financial ruin. Individuals face risks to their personal and financial information. At a national level, critical infrastructure, such as power grids and healthcare systems, can be compromised, posing a threat to national security.

In the worst-case scenario, a sophisticated, coordinated cyberattack could cripple critical infrastructures, leading to widespread chaos. In the best-case scenario, this shift in cybersecurity approach could lead to a more robust and resilient defense mechanism that can mitigate cyber threats.

Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities Exploited

Recent cyberattacks have leveraged a range of tactics including phishing, ransomware, zero-day exploits, and social engineering. The exploitation of these vulnerabilities reveals weaknesses in existing security systems, namely the lack of a comprehensive, coordinated defense strategy.

Legal, Ethical, and Regulatory Consequences

As cyber threats evolve, so too must laws and regulations. Current cybersecurity policies may not be sufficient to address the increasingly sophisticated threats. Consequently, there could be lawsuits, government action, or fines for businesses that fail to adequately protect customer data.

Practical Security Measures and Solutions

To prevent similar attacks, companies and individuals need to adopt a comprehensive and multi-pronged approach to cybersecurity. This includes employing a diverse team of cybersecurity professionals, implementing robust security policies, providing regular training and awareness programs, and investing in state-of-the-art cybersecurity tools.

Success stories from companies that have successfully prevented cyber threats can serve as practical case studies. For instance, a leading financial institution implemented a zero-trust architecture, effectively mitigating potential threats.

A Future Outlook on Cybersecurity

This shift from unicorns to a herd of horses in cybersecurity will undoubtedly shape the future of the industry. As cyber threats continue to evolve, so too must our approach to cybersecurity. Emerging technologies such as AI, blockchain, and zero-trust architecture will play a crucial role in shaping the future of cybersecurity.

In conclusion, it is never too late to join the herd. Together, we can build a more secure digital future. The key lies in acknowledging the complexity and diversity of cyber threats, and in leveraging the strength of a coordinated, multifaceted defense strategy.

Overview

In today’s post, we examine a severe security vulnerability discovered in PerfreeBlog version 4.0.11, identified as CVE-2025-29281. This vulnerability allows regular users to exploit the arbitrary file upload feature in the attach component, leading to potential system compromise or data leakage. Considering PerfreeBlog’s widespread use, this vulnerability presents a significant risk to many users and organizations, underscoring the need for immediate action to rectify this security flaw.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-29281
Severity: High (CVSS 8.8)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

PerfreeBlog | 4.0.11

How the Exploit Works

The vulnerability originates from an insufficient validation mechanism in the file upload function of PerfreeBlog’s attach component. Regular users can upload arbitrary files, which can include harmful code. Once the files are uploaded and executed, they can disrupt system operations, compromise data, or enable more sophisticated attacks.

Conceptual Example Code

Let’s consider a scenario where a regular user decides to upload a malicious PHP file. The HTTP request might look like this:

POST /attach/upload HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundary7MA4YWxkTrZu0gW
------WebKitFormBoundary7MA4YWxkTrZu0gW
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="exploit.php"
Content-Type: application/x-php
<?php
system($_GET['cmd']);
?>
------WebKitFormBoundary7MA4YWxkTrZu0gW--

In this conceptual example, the attacker uploads a PHP file that, when executed, can run arbitrary system commands on the server, potentially compromising the system’s security.

Mitigation and Prevention

To mitigate this vulnerability, PerfreeBlog users should immediately apply the patch provided by the vendor. In the absence of a vendor patch, implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can serve as a temporary measure to detect and prevent the exploitation of this vulnerability. Regular audits of system and application logs can also help identify any attempts to exploit this vulnerability.

The cybersecurity landscape has once again been thrust into the limelight following an alert from the United States Embassy in Zambia. This alert pertains to the country’s new cybersecurity law and its potential implications. This development has raised concerns about the future of digital freedom in Zambia and the broader implications for cybersecurity worldwide.

A Historical Perspective

Cybersecurity in Zambia has been a subject of extensive debate since the passing of the controversial Cybersecurity and Cybercrimes Act in 2021. This law, which was initially proposed to enhance the country’s cybersecurity infrastructure, has attracted criticism due to its potential for misuse in infringing upon digital rights and freedoms.

The Unfolding of the Event

The U.S. Embassy in Zambia issued an alert on February 3, 2022, warning American citizens in the country about the potential risks associated with this new law. The embassy urged everyone to exercise caution when posting or sharing information online, as the law could potentially be used to prosecute those deemed to be spreading “false information.

Potential Risks and Implications

The alert has sparked a wave of concern among businesses, individuals, and non-governmental organizations operating in Zambia. The law could inadvertently lead to self-censorship as individuals and organizations strive to avoid falling foul of the ambiguous “false information” clause. This could stifle innovation and freedom of expression, crucial components of a thriving digital economy.

Underlying Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

While the law ostensibly aims to tackle cybercrime, it may inadvertently expose Zambian internet users to new threats. The law’s broad and vague definitions could be used to justify wide-scale surveillance, undermining privacy and potentially opening the door to phishing and other cyber-attacks.

Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Consequences

The Zambian Cybersecurity and Cybercrimes Act has raised serious legal and ethical questions. Its potential to infringe upon digital rights could lead to legal challenges both locally and internationally. Moreover, the law’s enforcement could lead to diplomatic tensions, as evidenced by the U.S. embassy’s alert.

Practical Security Measures and Solutions

In light of these developments, it is imperative for businesses and individuals to adopt robust cybersecurity practices. This includes using secure and encrypted communication channels, regularly updating software and devices, and employing strong, unique passwords. Organizations should also consider cybersecurity training for their employees to increase awareness of the potential risks.

The Future Outlook

The Zambian Cybersecurity and Cybercrimes Act underscores the increasing complexity of the cybersecurity landscape. It serves as a stark reminder of the need for clear, comprehensive, and balanced cybersecurity laws that protect users without infringing upon their digital rights. As technology evolves, so too will cyber threats, making the need for robust cybersecurity measures and regulations more critical than ever.

The situation in Zambia should serve as a wake-up call to all stakeholders in the digital space. It highlights the importance of maintaining a delicate balance between cybersecurity and digital rights, a task that will undoubtedly shape the future of the internet. As we navigate this ever-evolving landscape, it is clear that proactive and informed cybersecurity practices will be our best defense against the myriad of threats that lie ahead.

Overview

CVE-2025-28137 is a critical vulnerability discovered in the TOTOLINK A810R V4.1.2cu.5182_B20201026, a popular wireless router model. The device was found to contain a pre-authentication remote command execution vulnerability in the setNoticeCfg function through the NoticeUrl parameter. The implications of this vulnerability are severe as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on a vulnerable device without requiring any form of authentication. This vulnerability has been rated as critical due to its high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-28137
Severity: Critical (9.8 CVSS Score)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Impact: Potential system compromise and data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

TOTOLINK A810R | V4.1.2cu.5182_B20201026

How the Exploit Works

This vulnerability resides in the setNoticeCfg function of the TOTOLINK A810R firmware, specifically within the NoticeUrl parameter. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted request containing malicious commands to this function. The router firmware fails to adequately sanitize the input to this function, which allows the attacker’s commands to be executed with root privileges on the device.

Conceptual Example Code

Here is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This is a simple HTTP request where the attacker injects malicious commands into the NoticeUrl parameter.

POST /setNoticeCfg HTTP/1.1
Host: <Router_IP_Address>
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
NoticeUrl=; <malicious_command>;

In this example, replace “ with the IP address of the vulnerable router and “ with the command you wish to execute on the device. The semicolon (`;`) is used to separate the legitimate NoticeUrl value from the malicious command.

Mitigation

The best mitigation strategy for this vulnerability is to apply the vendor’s patch. It is also highly recommended to implement a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) as temporary mitigation until the patch can be applied. Regularly update and patch your systems to avoid falling victim to such vulnerabilities.

The automotive industry, long known for its contributions to technological advancement, is now on the brink of a new chapter – one that involves an escalating threat from cyber criminals. This transition is fueled by the rise of connected and autonomous vehicles, which, while signaling exciting progress, also present a new array of cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

The Backdrop of the Cyber Threat

The evolution of the automotive industry has been nothing short of spectacular. However, the integration of sophisticated digital technology has opened Pandora’s box for potential cyber threats. Recently, alarming reports have emerged suggesting that the automotive industry could be at the cusp of a cyber war. As we delve into the digital era of autonomous vehicles and Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled cars, it’s crucial to understand the accompanying cybersecurity risks.

The Story Unfolds: Cybersecurity in the Automotive Realm

Over the past few years, several incidents have surfaced that highlight the vulnerability of the automotive sector to cyber threats. In one high-profile case, researchers demonstrated the ability to remotely hack and control a Jeep Cherokee, leading to a recall of 1.4 million vehicles.

Experts from cybersecurity firms, government agencies, and even automakers themselves acknowledge the increasing prevalence of these threats. They point to factors such as the increasing complexity of vehicle systems, the growing use of software, and the rise of connectivity as the main reasons behind this new threat.

Untangling the Risks and Implications

The potential risks of cyber threats in the automotive industry are staggering. Not only do they pose a threat to the safety of passengers and pedestrians, but they could also disrupt entire transportation systems, impacting national security and economies. Worst-case scenarios could see cybercriminals taking control of vehicles en masse, while the best-case scenarios would involve isolated incidents with no physical harm or major disruptions.

Exposing Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

The vulnerabilities exploited in these cyber threats are often related to the vehicle’s software and connectivity features. Attack vectors could include phishing attempts, exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities, or leveraging social engineering tactics to gain unauthorized access.

The Legal, Ethical, and Regulatory Consequences

In response to these threats, governments and regulatory bodies are beginning to take action. New laws and regulations are being drafted to enhance the cybersecurity robustness of vehicles, while lawsuits and hefty fines could be in store for automakers who fail to adequately protect their vehicles.

Securing the Automotive Future

Companies can take a proactive approach to prevent similar attacks by implementing robust cybersecurity measures. This could include regular software updates, intrusion detection systems, and providing cybersecurity training to employees. Case studies of companies like Tesla, who have taken strong steps to secure their vehicles, can serve as a guide.

The Road Ahead: A Cybersecure Automotive Future

The events unfolding in the automotive cybersecurity landscape are a reminder of the evolving nature of cyber threats. As we move ahead, emerging technologies like AI, Blockchain, and zero-trust architecture will play pivotal roles in shaping a secure automotive future. The key will be to stay vigilant, adapt, and learn from these incidents to stay one step ahead of potential threats.

In conclusion, while the road to a cybersecure automotive future may be challenging, it is a journey that the industry must undertake to ensure the safety and security of its consumers and the broader public. Whether the industry is indeed on the cusp of a cyber war remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the need for robust automotive cybersecurity has never been more critical.

Overview

CVE-2025-26959 is a critical security vulnerability in the Quý Lê 91 Administrator Z software that could potentially lead to system compromise or data leakage. The issue stems from a missing authorization vulnerability, allowing an attacker to escalate their privileges on the system. This is a significant cybersecurity concern, as it affects all versions of Administrator Z up until 2025.03.24. The impact of this vulnerability can be severe, with potential consequences including unauthorized access to sensitive data and control over affected systems.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-26959
Severity: Critical (8.8 CVSS Score)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

Quý Lê 91 Administrator Z | All versions up to and including 2025.03.24

How the Exploit Works

The exploit takes advantage of a missing authorization check in the Quý Lê 91 Administrator Z software. This oversight allows an attacker, who already has low-level privileges on the system, to escalate their privileges without being detected.
The attacker can do this by sending specially crafted requests to the vulnerable system. These requests are designed to bypass the normal authorization checks that should prevent a low-privileged user from gaining higher privileges. Once the attacker has escalated their privileges, they can potentially compromise the system or cause data leakage.

Conceptual Example Code

Below is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This is a simplified version of a potential HTTP request an attacker could use:

POST /admin/escalate_privileges HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "user_id": "attacker", "desired_privilege_level": "admin" }

In this example, the attacker is sending a POST request to the `/admin/escalate_privileges` endpoint. The JSON payload contains the attacker’s user id and the desired privilege level they wish to escalate to. This request could potentially bypass the missing authorization check, allowing the attacker to gain admin privileges.
Please note that this is a conceptual example, actual exploit code would be more complex and tailored to the specific weaknesses in the software.

Mitigation Guidance

To mitigate this vulnerability, users of Quý Lê 91 Administrator Z should apply the vendor patch as soon as possible. This patch should correct the missing authorization check, preventing privilege escalation.
If the vendor patch cannot be applied immediately, a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can be used as a temporary mitigation. These tools can monitor network traffic for suspicious activity, such as attempts to exploit this vulnerability, and block these attempts before they reach the vulnerable system. However, this should be seen as a temporary solution until the vendor patch can be applied.

In the digital age, data is a priceless commodity. The power and potential that data holds are immense, which is why it becomes a hotbed for cyber threats. Recently, the spotlight has been cast on a particular player: DOGE. The question on everyone’s minds is, “What is DOGE planning to do with all that data?”

A Brief Backstory

DOGE, an entity known for its significant presence in the digital realm, recently came into possession of a vast amount of data. This event has set alarms ringing across the cybersecurity landscape due to the sheer volume and sensitive nature of the data involved. The urgency of the situation lies not just in the fact that such a mass data acquisition has occurred, but also because the intentions behind this move remain unclear.

Unpacking the Event

The data acquisition event unfolded rapidly, with DOGE managing to secure a vast amount of data in a relatively short time span. While the specifics are still under wraps, preliminary research and expert insights suggest that potential motives could range from competitive advantage to targeted cyber attacks.

This incident isn’t an isolated one. It draws parallels with similar cybersecurity breaches in the past, such as the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal, where data of millions of Facebook users were harvested for political advertising.

Industry Implications and Potential Risks

The biggest stakeholders affected by this incident are the individuals and businesses whose data has been acquired. The impacts are multifold. For individuals, it could mean potential identity theft, financial loss, or privacy invasion. Businesses face the risk of losing their competitive edge, alongside potential reputation damage and economic losses.

In a worst-case scenario, this data could be used for nefarious purposes, leading to widespread damage. Conversely, the best-case scenario would see the data used ethically and responsibly, with no harm inflicted upon stakeholders.

Identifying Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

While the exact methods used in this data acquisition are yet to be confirmed, it’s likely that a combination of techniques was employed, including phishing, ransomware, and potentially even zero-day exploits. This incident exposes the weaknesses present in many security systems, particularly their vulnerability to sophisticated cyber-attacks.

Legal, Ethical, and Regulatory Consequences

This data acquisition raises several legal and ethical questions. Laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) come into play, with potential lawsuits, government action, and hefty fines on the horizon if the data is found to have been acquired or used unlawfully.

Securing the Digital Frontier

To prevent similar incidents, businesses and individuals need to employ robust cybersecurity measures. This includes regular security audits, employing multi-factor authentication, regular staff training on cyber threats, and implementing a zero-trust architecture. Companies like Microsoft have successfully mitigated similar threats through these practices.

Shaping the Future of Cybersecurity

This incident serves as a stark reminder of the evolving threats in the cybersecurity landscape. As we move forward, emerging technologies like AI and blockchain will play a significant role in shaping cybersecurity strategies. It’s crucial that we learn from these incidents and stay vigilant to stay a step ahead of potential cyber threats. The future of cybersecurity hinges on our ability to adapt, innovate, and implement robust security measures that can withstand the complexities of the digital world.

Overview

The scope of this blog post revolves around a critical vulnerability found in NotFound GNUCommerce, denoted by the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) identifier CVE-2025-30985. This is a Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability, which could potentially lead to severe system compromise or data leakage. As GNUCommerce is a widely used eCommerce platform, the CVE-2025-30985 vulnerability could affect a significant number of online businesses, making it a pressing issue in the cybersecurity community.
The severity of this vulnerability is underscored by its high CVSS Severity Score of 9.8, putting it near the top of the scale in terms of potential damage. Understanding this vulnerability, its effects, and how to mitigate it, is crucial for any entity utilizing GNUCommerce from version n/a through 1.5.4.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-30985
Severity: Critical (9.8 CVSS Score)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Impact: System compromise, potential data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

NotFound GNUCommerce | n/a through 1.5.4

How the Exploit Works

The exploit takes advantage of a flaw in the deserialization process of data in NotFound GNUCommerce. In a nutshell, deserialization is the process of converting a stream of bytes back into a copy of the original object. The problem arises when an attacker can manipulate the serialized object to include malicious code. When the system deserializes the untrusted data, it inadvertently executes the malicious code, which could lead to a complete system compromise or data leakage.

Conceptual Example Code

Here is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This example uses a malicious JSON payload in a POST request:

POST /vulnerable/endpoint HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
Content-Type: application/json
{
"object": {
"_type": "someClass",
"_value": {
"command": "rm -rf /"  // an example of a malicious command
}
}
}

In this example, the attacker sends a serialized object containing a malicious command via a POST request. If the system deserializes this untrusted data, it could execute the malicious command.
Strong> Mitigation Guidance
The best way to mitigate this vulnerability is to apply the vendor’s patch once it is available. In the meantime, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can serve as a temporary mitigation measure. These systems can detect and block known malicious payloads, providing a layer of security until the patch can be applied.
Remember, the most effective cybersecurity strategies involve proactive measures. Stay informed about the latest vulnerabilities and ensure your systems are regularly updated to the latest security standards.

A Historic Encounter in the Cybersecurity Landscape

The recent cybersecurity summit held by the Pan Asian American Business Council (PAABC) in Chicago, as reported by FOX 32, marked a significant milestone in the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity. This event’s relevance traces back to the increasing spate of cyber attacks globally, which have redefined how businesses approach their data security. The urgency of the situation is underscored by the rising costs associated with cybercrime, projected to reach $6 trillion annually by 2021.

The Unfolding of the Summit

The summit was a meeting of minds, bringing together cybersecurity experts, government representatives, and business leaders. Their collective goal was to address the burgeoning cybersecurity threats that businesses, particularly in the Asian-American community, are confronting. The event was prompted by a recent uptick in cyber attacks targeting Asian-American businesses, following a similar trend in physical hate crimes against this community.

The summit featured insights from top cybersecurity professionals, law enforcement agencies, and affected business owners. One key reference was the infamous SolarWinds hack, a stark reminder of how even the most robust security systems can be compromised.

Industry Implications and Potential Risks

The major stakeholders impacted by these cyber threats include not just the businesses directly targeted but also their customers, partners, and even national security. A successful breach can lead to the theft of sensitive customer data, intellectual property, and potentially even national security secrets.

In the worst-case scenario, a cyber attack could cripple a business, leading to significant financial losses or even bankruptcy. However, the best-case outcome following this event would be a heightened awareness that leads to the implementation of stronger cybersecurity measures by businesses.

Exposed Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

The primary vulnerability exploited in these attacks is often not technical but human. Social engineering techniques like phishing are commonly employed to trick employees into revealing sensitive information. These attacks expose a critical weakness in many security systems: the lack of sufficient employee training in cybersecurity best practices.

Legal, Ethical, and Regulatory Consequences

The legal implications of these breaches could be profound. Companies may face lawsuits from affected customers, fines from regulatory bodies, and potential government actions. Existing laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) offer a framework for such consequences.

Practical Security Measures & Solutions

To prevent similar attacks, businesses must invest in robust security infrastructure and regular employee training. Expert-backed solutions such as multi-factor authentication, regular software updates, and strong password protocols can significantly reduce the risk of a breach. Case studies, like that of Google successfully thwarting phishing attempts, provide practical examples of these measures in action.

The Future of Cybersecurity

The PAABC’s cybersecurity summit will undoubtedly shape the future of cybersecurity, emphasizing the need for ongoing dialogue between businesses, government, and cybersecurity experts. It serves as a reminder that staying ahead of evolving threats requires constant vigilance and investment in the latest security technologies, such as AI, blockchain, and zero-trust architecture. The event also underlines the importance of collaboration in creating a safer digital environment for all businesses.