Ameeba Security Research

Defensive CVE and exploit intelligence

Ameeba Blog Search
TRENDING · 1 WEEK
Attack Vector
Vendor
Severity

CVE-2025-59344: SSRF Vulnerability in AliasVault API Undermines Network Security

Views: 318

Overview

The CVE-2025-59344 vulnerability is a significant cybersecurity concern for all users of AliasVault API versions 0.23.0 and lower. The flaw lies in the server-side request forgery (SSRF) within the favicon extraction feature. This vulnerability can potentially lead to system compromise or data leakage, underlining its critical nature.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-59344
Severity: High (7.7 CVSS Score)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Potential system compromise and data leakage

Affected Products

Ameeba Chat Icon Share secrets securely

Ameeba is private infrastructure for communication and sensitive work built on encrypted identity instead of exposed corporate identity systems.

Passwords, credentials, confidential files, screenshots, internal discussions, sensitive AI context, and private coordination should not become exposed across ordinary communication platforms.

  • • Encrypted identity
  • • Private Spaces for organizations and teams
  • • End-to-end encrypted chat, calls, files, and notes
  • • Sensitive AI work and protected collaboration
  • • Built for information that cannot leak

Our mission is to secure human work alongside AI.

Product | Affected Versions

AliasVault API | 0.23.0 and lower

How the Exploit Works

The exploitation of this vulnerability requires a low-privilege user to submit a URL to the favicon extraction feature. Although the initial URL goes through validation, the extractor complies with redirects and is unable to block requests to loopback or internal IP ranges. An attacker can use this to force the backend into making HTTP(S) requests to arbitrary internal hosts and non-default ports. The response, if the target host serves a favicon or any other valid image, is returned to the attacker in Base64 form. Even without returned data, timing and error behavior can be exploited to map internal services.

Conceptual Example Code

This is a conceptual example of an HTTP request that could exploit the vulnerability:

POST /favicon_extractor HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "url": "http://internal-host:non_default_port" }

This request would cause the backend to fetch the favicon from an internal host on a non-default port, potentially revealing sensitive data or mapping internal services.

Want to discuss this further? Join the Ameeba Cybersecurity Group Chat.

Disclaimer:

The information and code presented in this article are provided for educational and defensive cybersecurity purposes only. Any conceptual or pseudocode examples are simplified representations intended to raise awareness and promote secure development and system configuration practices.

Do not use this information to attempt unauthorized access or exploit vulnerabilities on systems that you do not own or have explicit permission to test.

Ameeba and its authors do not endorse or condone malicious behavior and are not responsible for misuse of the content. Always follow ethical hacking guidelines, responsible disclosure practices, and local laws.

More posts

Ameeba Chat