Overview
A critical vulnerability, identified as CVE-2024-58260, has been discovered in Rancher Manager. This vulnerability allows users with update permissions on other User resources to cause denial of access for targeted accounts. The issue arises due to missing server-side validation on the `.username` field. Such a vulnerability poses a potential threat to the system’s security and data integrity.
Vulnerability Summary
CVE ID: CVE-2024-58260
Severity: Critical; CVSS Score: 7.6
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Possible system compromise and data leakage
Affected Products
Share secrets securely
Ameeba is private infrastructure for communication and sensitive work built on encrypted identity instead of exposed corporate identity systems.
Passwords, credentials, confidential files, screenshots, internal discussions, sensitive AI context, and private coordination should not become exposed across ordinary communication platforms.
- • Encrypted identity
- • Private Spaces for organizations and teams
- • End-to-end encrypted chat, calls, files, and notes
- • Sensitive AI work and protected collaboration
- • Built for information that cannot leak
Our mission is to secure human work alongside AI.
Product | Affected Versions
Rancher Manager | All versions before the patch
How the Exploit Works
An attacker with update permissions on other User resources can exploit this vulnerability. The attacker fills the `.username` field with specially crafted entries, which due to the missing server-side validation, can cause denial of access for the specified user. This can potentially lead to unauthorized system access or data leakage.
Conceptual Example Code
An attacker might exploit the vulnerability with a malicious HTTP request similar to the following:
PUT /v3/users/{userId} HTTP/1.1
Host: rancher.example.com
Content-Type: application/json
{
"username": "targeted_username",
"accessMode": "blocked"
}
In this conceptual example, the attacker sends a PUT request to the user update endpoint with the targeted_username and sets the accessMode to ‘blocked’. As a result, the targeted user is denied access to their account.
Note: This is a conceptual example and may not directly apply to the vulnerable system. The actual exploit might differ based on the system configuration and the attacker’s approach.
