Author: Ameeba

Overview

In this blog post, we delve into the details of a critical vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-43557, affecting Animate versions 24.0.8, 23.0.11, and earlier. This vulnerability is particularly concerning as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user, potentially compromising the system or leading to data leakage. Understanding the severity of this vulnerability, its implications, and the mitigation strategies is crucial for organizations and individuals using the affected versions of Animate.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-43557
Severity: High (7.8 CVSS Severity Score)
Attack Vector: Access of Uninitialized Pointer
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Arbitrary code execution, potential system compromise, and possible data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

Animate | 24.0.8 and earlier
Animate | 23.0.11 and earlier

How the Exploit Works

The vulnerability CVE-2025-43557 is an Access of Uninitialized Pointer type. It exists due to improper initialization of a pointer in the affected Animate software. An attacker can craft a malicious file, which when opened by a user, can cause the software to dereference an uninitialized pointer. This could potentially lead to memory corruption, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. This can subsequently lead to unauthorized access and control over the system, or data leakage.

Conceptual Example Code

Below is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability could be exploited:

#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int *ptr = NULL;  //Pointer is not initialized
*ptr = 2018;  //Trying to access memory location which is not allocated
printf("%d", *ptr);  //This will cause segmentation fault
return 0;
}

In this example, a pointer is declared but not initialized to any memory location. When the program tries to assign a value to the memory location pointed to by the uninitialized pointer, a segmentation fault occurs. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by causing a segmentation fault and subsequently injecting malicious code to be executed.

Mitigation Guidance

Users are advised to update to the latest version of Animate as soon as possible to rectify this vulnerability. Until the software can be updated, a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) could be used as a temporary mitigation strategy. Additionally, users should be cautious while opening files from untrusted sources, as exploitation of this vulnerability requires user interaction.

Overview

The year 2025 has seen a critical vulnerability, CVE-2025-43556, surface in versions 24.0.8, 23.0.11 and earlier of the software application Animate. This vulnerability is particularly concerning as it can lead to an integer overflow or wraparound, which in turn could result in the execution of arbitrary code. This execution occurs in the context of the current user, which makes the exploit even more potent as it could potentially compromise the entire system or lead to data leakage. The exploit requires user interaction, specifically, the victim would need to open a malicious file.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-43556
Severity: High (CVSS: 7.8)
Attack Vector: Local
Privileges Required: User level
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Potential system compromise and data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

Animate | 24.0.8 and earlier
Animate | 23.0.11 and earlier

How the Exploit Works

The exploit takes advantage of an integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability. In computer systems, an integer overflow occurs when an arithmetic operation attempts to create a numeric value that is too large to fit in the available storage space. In the case of CVE-2025-43556, a malicious actor could craft a file that, when opened by a victim, triggers this overflow. This in turn can cause the software to behave unpredictably, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.

Conceptual Example Code

Below is a conceptual representation of how a malicious file might be crafted. This pseudocode is not meant to be functional but rather to illustrate the general idea:

# Pseudocode
malicious_file = open("exploit.txt", "w")
# String that's too long, leading to integer overflow
long_string = "A" * (2**31)
malicious_payload = "{ 'data': '" + long_string + "' }"
malicious_file.write(malicious_payload)
malicious_file.close()

In this example, a file named “exploit.txt” is created and a string that is too long to be handled by the Animate application is written to it. When this file is opened in Animate, it triggers an integer overflow, leading to the potential for arbitrary code execution.

Overview

The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) program has recently identified a significant vulnerability in Animate versions 24.0.8, 23.0.11 and earlier. This vulnerability, classified as CVE-2025-43555, is an Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) that could potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. The severity of this vulnerability is compounded by the fact that its exploitation could lead to system compromise or data leakage, making it a critical issue for all users of the affected Animate versions. This article aims to provide detailed insight into this vulnerability, its potential impact, and how users can mitigate the potential risks.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-43555
Severity: High (7.8 CVSS score)
Attack Vector: Local
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Arbitrary code execution, potential system compromise or data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

Animate | 24.0.8 and earlier versions
Animate | 23.0.11 and earlier versions

How the Exploit Works

The Integer Underflow vulnerability occurs when an integer used in the software’s operation is decremented below its minimum value, causing it to wrap around to its maximum value. In this case, a malicious actor could craft a file that, when opened by a victim, triggers the underflow and allows the execution of arbitrary code in the context of the current user. This could potentially give the attacker the same rights as the current user, leading to system compromise or data leakage.

Conceptual Example Code

The following is a conceptual example of how a malicious file might be crafted to exploit the vulnerability. Please note that this is a simplified example and real-world exploits may be more complex.

# integer underflow exploit
# arbitrary function that triggers underflow
def trigger_underflow(input):
minimum_value = 0
underflow_value = input - 1
if underflow_value < minimum_value:
underflow_value = MAX_INT
return underflow_value
# crafted file with malicious payload
with open('malicious_file', 'w') as f:
f.write('malicious_payload: ' + str(trigger_underflow(0)))

As shown in the above pseudocode, the attacker writes a malicious payload to a file, which when opened, triggers an integer underflow, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.

Mitigation Guidance

Users affected by this vulnerability should apply the vendor patch as soon as it’s available. In the meantime, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can provide temporary mitigation. It is also advisable to avoid opening files from untrusted sources. Regularly updating software and maintaining a robust cybersecurity posture is critical to mitigating such vulnerabilities.

Overview

The cybersecurity landscape is persistently changing with new vulnerabilities arising regularly. One such vulnerability is CVE-2025-43547, which affects users of Bridge versions 15.0.3, 14.1.6, and earlier. This vulnerability, an instance of Integer Overflow or Wraparound, could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. The caveat here is that the exploitation of this vulnerability requires user interaction, meaning a victim must open a malicious file for the exploit to be successful.
The gravity of this vulnerability is not to be underestimated. It not only threatens the integrity of systems running these Bridge versions but also places sensitive data at risk. The likelihood of system compromise or data leakage is high, thereby making it a critical issue that demands immediate attention and remediation.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-43547
Severity: High (CVSS: 7.8)
Attack Vector: Local
Privileges Required: User
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

Bridge | 15.0.3 and earlier
Bridge | 14.1.6 and earlier

How the Exploit Works

The vulnerability stems from an Integer Overflow or Wraparound issue in the affected Bridge versions. In essence, this type of vulnerability occurs when an integer used in the software’s operation reaches its maximum value and wraps around to its minimum value or vice versa.
In the case of CVE-2025-43547, this wraparound error could be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary code. The attacker would need to craft a malicious file that, when opened by the victim, triggers the integer overflow. This action could then allow the attacker to execute code in the context of the current user, potentially leading to system compromise or data leakage.

Conceptual Example Code

Below is a conceptual example of how this vulnerability might be exploited. Note that this is a simplified representation and actual exploitation would require a more complex payload and possibly additional steps.

#!/usr/bin/env python
# This is pseudocode for a potential exploit
# It is likely much more complex in a real-world scenario
malicious_file = open("exploit.txt", "w")
overflow_int = 2**31 # this triggers the integer overflow
malicious_code = "..." # place the arbitrary code here
malicious_file.write(str(overflow_int) + malicious_code)
malicious_file.close()

In this example, the attacker creates a file (‘exploit.txt’) with a payload that includes an integer value that will overflow, followed by the attacker’s arbitrary code. If a user opens this file, the integer overflow will trigger, executing the malicious code in the context of the user.

Overview

The world of cybersecurity is a constantly evolving battlefield, and the latest threat to surface is CVE-2025-43545. This vulnerability affects Bridge versions 15.0.3, 14.1.6, and earlier versions. This issue is of significant concern because it could potentially lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. The exploitation of this vulnerability requires user interaction, specifically, the victim must open a malicious file. The potential impact of exploiting this vulnerability includes system compromise and data leakage.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-43545
Severity: High (7.8 CVSS Score)
Attack Vector: Local
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Potential system compromise and data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

Bridge | 15.0.3, 14.1.6, and earlier

How the Exploit Works

The vulnerability arises from an uninitialized pointer in Bridge’s codebase. This means that the pointer in question does not point to any meaningful value before its first use. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability by crafting a file that manipulates the uninitialized pointer to point to a malicious piece of code. When the victim opens the crafted file, the malicious code is executed in the context of the current user, potentially compromising the system or leading to data leakage.

Conceptual Example Code

While the specifics of the exploit are beyond the scope of this blog post, the conceptual exploit might involve crafting a malicious file such that when opened with Bridge, it would look something like this:

#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
// Pointer is declared but not initialized
int *ptr;
// Malicious code here, which the pointer is manipulated to point to
execute_malicious_code();
return 0;
}

In this conceptual example, a pointer is declared but not initialized. The malicious file would then contain code that manipulates the uninitialized pointer to point to a function that executes malicious code in the context of the current user.
Remember, this is a conceptual example and the actual exploit would likely be more complex and specifically tailored to the vulnerabilities in Bridge’s codebase.