Author: Ameeba

  • CVE-2025-43574: Use After Free Vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat Reader

    Overview

    The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) system has reported a significant vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat Reader, identified as CVE-2025-43574. This vulnerability affects several versions of the Adobe Acrobat Reader, a widely used software for viewing, creating, manipulating, and managing files in Portable Document Format (PDF). This vulnerability is of particular concern due to the vast user base of Adobe Acrobat Reader, which spans across individual users, small businesses, and large corporations, making it a potential target for cybercriminals.
    The vulnerability in question is a Use After Free Vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution. This means that an attacker could manipulate the software to execute malicious code in the context of the current user. Exploiting this vulnerability requires user interaction, specifically, the user must open a malicious file. The implications of such a vulnerability are severe, as it could potentially result in a system compromise or even data leakage.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-43574
    Severity: High, CVSS Score 7.8
    Attack Vector: Local
    Privileges Required: User
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: Arbitrary code execution, potential system compromise, and data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Adobe Acrobat Reader | 24.001.30235, 20.005.30763, 25.001.20521 and earlier versions

    How the Exploit Works

    The exploit takes advantage of a Use After Free vulnerability in Acrobat Reader. This type of vulnerability occurs when a program continues to use a pointer after it has been freed. In this case, an attacker could trick a user into opening a malicious PDF file that contains a specific code designed to exploit the vulnerability. The malicious code is then executed in the context of the current user.

    Conceptual Example Code

    While the specific code to exploit this vulnerability is beyond the scope of this article, a conceptual example might look something like this:

    # pseudocode
    def exploit():
    malicious_code = "..."
    free(pointer)
    # The pointer is now dangling
    pointer.execute(malicious_code)

    In this pseudocode example, the `malicious_code` would be tailored to exploit the Use After Free vulnerability in Acrobat Reader, leading to arbitrary code execution.

  • CVE-2025-54135: Critical Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Cursor Code Editor

    Overview

    The vulnerability CVE-2025-54135 has been recently discovered in Cursor, an AI-based code editor. The vulnerability allows a potential attacker to write in-workspace files without requiring user approval, thereby leading to a possible Remote Code Execution (RCE). This vulnerability affects versions below 1.3.9 of Cursor and can lead to significant security risks including system compromise or data leakage. Given the increasing popularity of AI-based code editors among developers, this vulnerability could have widespread implications if not addressed promptly.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-54135
    Severity: High (8.5 CVSS Score)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Cursor Code Editor | <1.3.9 How the Exploit Works

    The exploit works by taking advantage of a loophole in the file permission settings of Cursor. The code editor allows writing in-workspace files without requiring user approval. If the file is a dotfile, editing it requires approval but creating a new one doesn’t. Therefore, if sensitive MCP files such as .cursor/mcp.json do not already exist in the workspace, an attacker can chain a indirect prompt injection vulnerability to hijack the context to write to the settings file and trigger Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the victim’s system without user approval.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Here is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited using a shell command:

    # Create a new .cursor/mcp.json file
    echo '{ "settings": { "command": "malicious_command_here" } }' > .cursor/mcp.json
    # Trigger the indirect prompt injection vulnerability
    curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"filename":".cursor/mcp.json","content":"malicious_content_here"}' http://target.example.com/vulnerable/endpoint

    The above code first creates a new .cursor/mcp.json file with a malicious command. Then, it triggers the indirect prompt injection vulnerability by sending a POST request to a vulnerable endpoint on the target’s system, which subsequently writes the malicious content to the settings file leading to RCE.

    Remediation

    The vendor has released a patch that fixes this vulnerability in version 1.3.9 of Cursor. All users are strongly advised to update to the patched version as soon as possible. As a temporary mitigation, a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can be used to filter out malicious requests.

  • CVE-2025-54119: SQL Injection Vulnerability in ADOdb PHP Database Class Library

    Overview

    This blog post delves into the critical vulnerability, identified as CVE-2025-54119, which exists in ADOdb, a PHP database class library. This security flaw is of particular concern because it affects a wide array of web applications and systems using ADOdb versions 5.22.9 and below, as it may allow a malicious actor to execute arbitrary SQL statements. This vulnerability is significant due to the potential for system compromise or sensitive data leakage, which could lead to severe consequences for businesses, including financial loss and damage to reputation.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-54119
    Severity: Critical (CVSS 10.0)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: System Compromise, Potential Data Leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    ADOdb PHP Database Class Library | 5.22.9 and below

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability arises due to improper escaping of a query parameter in the metaColumns(), metaForeignKeys() or metaIndexes() methods of the ADOdb library when connecting to a sqlite3 database. A malicious attacker can craft a specially designed table name that, when used in these methods, can lead to the execution of arbitrary SQL statements. This exploit can manipulate or extract data from the database, potentially leading to full system compromise or data leakage.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Here is a conceptual example of how an attacker might exploit this vulnerability:

    SELECT * FROM malicious_table_name'; DROP TABLE sensitive_data;--

    In this example, the ‘malicious_table_name’ is the crafted table name that is passed into the vulnerable methods (metaColumns(), metaForeignKeys() or metaIndexes()). The crafted table name includes SQL syntax to drop a table named ‘sensitive_data’, demonstrating how an attacker could manipulate the database structure or data.

    Recommended Mitigation Steps

    The recommended solution to mitigate this vulnerability is to upgrade to ADOdb version 5.22.10, which contains a fix for this issue. In situations where an immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) as a temporary measure. However, these should not replace patching the vulnerability as they might not fully protect against all possible exploitation methods. Additionally, it is best practice to only pass controlled data to the metaColumns(), metaForeignKeys(), and metaIndexes() method’s $table parameter to prevent similar vulnerabilities.

  • CVE-2025-43573: Acrobat Reader Use After Free Vulnerability Leading to Arbitrary Code Execution

    Overview

    In the ever-changing landscape of cybersecurity, vulnerabilities are constantly being discovered and patched. One such vulnerability that has come to light is CVE-2025-43573, affecting several versions of Acrobat Reader, a widely used software across the globe. This vulnerability could lead to arbitrary code execution, potentially compromising user systems or leading to unauthorized data leakage. Given the ubiquity of Acrobat Reader, this vulnerability could have a wide-ranging impact, necessitating immediate attention and mitigation.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-43573
    Severity: High (CVSS Score: 7.8)
    Attack Vector: Local
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: Arbitrary code execution potentially leading to system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Acrobat Reader | 24.001.30235
    Acrobat Reader | 20.005.30763
    Acrobat Reader | 25.001.20521

    How the Exploit Works

    The CVE-2025-43573 vulnerability arises due to a ‘Use After Free’ flaw in the affected versions of Acrobat Reader. In essence, this means that the software continues to use memory after it has been freed or deleted. This can lead to unexpected behavior, including the execution of arbitrary code.
    In the case of this vulnerability, an attacker would have to craft a malicious file, which when opened by a victim using the vulnerable versions of Acrobat Reader, would trigger the flaw and allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. This could potentially result in a full system compromise or unauthorized data leakage.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Here is a conceptual example of how an attacker might craft a malicious PDF to exploit this vulnerability:

    # pseudo python code to create a malicious PDF
    import PyPDF2
    # Create a PDF object
    malicious_pdf = PyPDF2.PdfFileWriter()
    # Add malicious payload
    payload = """
    <insert malicious code here that triggers Use After Free vulnerability>
    """
    malicious_pdf.addPage(payload)
    # Save the PDF
    with open("malicious.pdf", "wb") as f:
    malicious_pdf.write(f)

    In this pseudo-code example, the attacker crafts a malicious PDF that contains the code to trigger the ‘Use After Free’ vulnerability when opened in the vulnerable version of Acrobat Reader. The actual payload would be specific to the vulnerability and the attacker’s intended outcome (e.g., arbitrary code execution, data exfiltration).
    Please note that the above is a conceptual example and is not intended to be used for malicious purposes. As a cybersecurity professional, it is our responsibility to understand these vulnerabilities to better protect our systems and data, not to exploit them.

  • CVE-2025-43550: Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability in Acrobat Reader

    Overview

    A significant vulnerability, CVE-2025-43550, has been identified in multiple versions of Acrobat Reader. This vulnerability is a Use After Free flaw that can potentially lead to arbitrary code execution, posing serious security threats to users and systems. The issue is particularly concerning due to its ability to execute code in the context of the current user, which means it can potentially lead to system compromise or data leakage. This vulnerability is significant as Acrobat Reader is widely used across various industries and sectors, so its exploitation could have widespread impacts.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-43550
    Severity: High (7.8 CVSS score)
    Attack Vector: Local
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: Arbitrary code execution, potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Acrobat Reader | 24.001.30235
    Acrobat Reader | 20.005.30763
    Acrobat Reader | 25.001.20521

    How the Exploit Works

    The CVE-2025-43550 vulnerability in Acrobat Reader is a Use After Free vulnerability. In such vulnerabilities, the program continues to use a pointer after it has been freed. This can result in an attacker being able to execute arbitrary code. In this case, the victim must open a malicious file, which triggers the vulnerability and allows the attacker to execute code in the context of the current user.

    Conceptual Example Code

    In the context of the CVE-2025-43550 vulnerability, an attacker might craft a malicious PDF file and attempt to get the victim to open it in one of the vulnerable versions of Acrobat Reader. Conceptually, the malicious file might contain code like the following:

    obj
    << /Type /Catalog
    /Pages 2 0 R
    /OpenAction 3 0 R
    >>
    endobj
    3 0 obj
    << /Type /Action
    /S /JavaScript
    /JS (var malicious_code = "/* malicious code here */"; malicious_code.run();)
    >>
    endobj

    Here, the `/JS` key contains JavaScript code that will be executed when the PDF file is opened. The `malicious_code.run();` line represents the execution of the attacker’s arbitrary code. Please note that this is a simplified, conceptual example and the actual exploit code would be more complex and specific.

    Mitigation Guidance

    To mitigate this vulnerability, users are advised to apply the vendor patch as soon as it becomes available. In the meantime, using Web Application Firewalls (WAF) or Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) can provide temporary mitigation. Regularly updating security software and being cautious about opening files from unknown sources can also help prevent such exploits.

  • CVE-2025-21120: Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server-Side Vulnerability in Dell Avamar

    Overview

    In the ever-expanding landscape of cybersecurity, new vulnerabilities continue to emerge, posing significant threats to organizations and their infrastructures. One such vulnerability, CVE-2025-21120, affects Dell Avamar, a popular data protection software solution. With potential risks including system compromise and data leakage, it’s crucial for IT security teams to understand and mitigate this vulnerability.
    This specific vulnerability affects Dell Avamar versions prior to 19.12 with patch 338905, excluding version 19.10SP1 with patch 338904. It involves a trusting HTTP permission method on the server-side, which could be exploited by a low privileged attacker with remote access. The potential risks are significant, making it a significant concern for IT security teams.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-21120
    Severity: High (8.3 CVSS Score)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: Low
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Potential system compromise and data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Dell Avamar | Versions prior to 19.12 with patch 338905, excluding version 19.10SP1 with patch 338904

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability lies in the server-side HTTP permission method that Avamar trusts. An attacker with low-level privileges and remote access can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to the server. Since the server trusts these permission methods, it does not adequately verify the requests, leading to potential information exposure.

    Conceptual Example Code

    The vulnerability might be exploited using a simple HTTP request like the following:

    POST /avamar-endpoint HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    { "malicious_payload": "Exploit_Code_Here" }

    In this example, the malicious payload would be carefully crafted to exploit the vulnerability, making the server execute actions that would lead to information exposure or potentially even full system compromise.

    Recommendations for Mitigation

    To mitigate this vulnerability, users are advised to apply the vendor patch (338905 for versions prior to 19.12, and 338904 for version 19.10SP1). In the absence of the patch, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) could provide temporary mitigation by monitoring and blocking suspicious activities. However, it’s essential to apply the vendor patch as soon as possible to effectively eliminate the vulnerability.

  • CVE-2025-27212: Command Injection Vulnerability in UniFi Access Devices

    Overview

    The recent discovery of the CVE-2025-27212 vulnerability has raised significant concern within the cybersecurity community due to its high severity and the potential for extensive system compromise. This vulnerability specifically affects a range of UniFi Access devices, which could have serious implications for countless businesses and organizations that use these devices for access management. It is particularly alarming as it allows a malicious actor to carry out a command injection if they gain access to the UniFi Access management network.
    This command injection vulnerability is a critical issue because it can potentially provide an attacker with the ability to execute arbitrary commands on the target system. This opens the door for other malicious activities such as unauthorized system modifications, data theft, and further system exploitation.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-27212
    Severity: Critical (CVSS Score 9.8)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: Low
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    UniFi Access Reader Pro | Version 2.14.21 and earlier
    UniFi Access G2 Reader Pro | Version 1.10.32 and earlier
    UniFi Access G3 Reader Pro | Version 1.10.30 and earlier
    UniFi Access Intercom | Version 1.7.28 and earlier
    UniFi Access G3 Intercom | Version 1.7.29 and earlier
    UniFi Access Intercom Viewer | Version 1.3.20 and earlier

    How the Exploit Works

    At a high level, this exploit takes advantage of improper input validation in certain UniFi Access devices. This flaw allows an attacker to inject malicious commands that the system then executes. To carry out this attack, a malicious actor would need access to the UniFi Access management network. This could be achieved through a variety of methods, including but not limited to, social engineering, network intrusion, or exploiting another vulnerability.

    Conceptual Example Code

    This is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. Note that the exact details of the exploit would vary depending on the specific circumstances and the attacker’s goals.

    POST /unifi/access/endpoint HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    { "command": "; rm -rf /" }

    In this example, the attacker sends a POST request to a vulnerable endpoint on the target system. The request payload includes a command preceded by a semicolon, which in many command-line environments allows for command chaining. The command `rm -rf /` is a destructive command that, if executed, would delete all files on the target system.

  • CVE-2025-46093: Critical Vulnerability in LiquidFiles Allowing Root Access via FTP SITE CHMOD

    Overview

    In this post, we will explore the details of a critical security vulnerability, known as CVE-2025-46093, that affects versions of LiquidFiles prior to 4.1.2. This vulnerability enables FTPDrop users to gain root-level access and execute arbitrary code on affected systems by leveraging the Actionscript feature and sudoers configuration. Given the severity and potential ramifications, understanding this vulnerability is critical for IT security professionals, system administrators, and developers who work with or support LiquidFiles systems.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-46093
    Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.9)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: Low
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    LiquidFiles | Before 4.1.2

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability stems from LiquidFiles’ support for FTP SITE CHMOD for mode 6777 (setuid and setgid). This allows FTPDrop users to manipulate file permissions, ultimately enabling them to execute arbitrary code as root. They achieve this by exploiting the Actionscript feature and the sudoers configuration. Given the power associated with root-level access, successful exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to full system compromise, including unauthorized data access, data modification, or service disruption.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Here’s a conceptual example of how an attacker might exploit this vulnerability:

    # Log in to the FTP server
    ftp target.example.com
    # Change to the directory containing the file to exploit
    cd /path/to/target/directory
    # Change the mode of the file to 6777 using SITE CHMOD
    SITE CHMOD 6777 targetfile
    # Execute the script as root
    echo "os.execute('sh')" > exploit.as && gcc -o exploit exploit.as
    # Use sudo to run the exploit script
    sudo ./exploit

    This example demonstrates how an attacker could use FTP SITE CHMOD to change file permissions, compile an exploit script, and then execute this script as root. This is just a conceptual demonstration; the actual exploitation would involve more complex and specific steps depending on the exact system configuration and the attacker’s objectives.

    Mitigation Guidance

    To remediate this vulnerability, users are advised to update their LiquidFiles software to version 4.1.2 or later, which contains a patch for this security issue. If immediate patching is not feasible, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can provide temporary mitigation. However, these measures only provide a stopgap solution and do not fully resolve the vulnerability. As such, patching should be carried out as soon as possible to fully protect systems from potential exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-51726: Weak Cryptographic Hash and Lacking High Entropy ASLR in CyberGhostVPNSetup.exe

    Overview

    The vulnerability CVE-2025-51726 presents a significant security risk to users of the CyberGhostVPNSetup.exe Windows installer. The software is exposed to potential supply-chain style attacks and privilege escalation through fake installers due to its use of the weak cryptographic hash algorithm SHA-1 and the absence of High Entropy Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR). SHA-1 is susceptible to collision attacks, enabling malicious actors to forge SHA-1 certificates and craft fake installers that could be validated by Windows signature verification mechanisms. This issue is particularly critical on systems without strict SmartScreen or trust policy enforcement.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-51726
    Severity: High (8.4 CVSS score)
    Attack Vector: Local network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    CyberGhost VPN | All versions prior to patch

    How the Exploit Works

    The exploit works by taking advantage of the weak SHA-1 cryptographic hash used by the CyberGhostVPNSetup.exe Windows installer. A malicious actor crafts a fake installer with a forged SHA-1 certificate, which can then be accepted by Windows signature verification mechanisms, especially on systems without strict SmartScreen or trust policy enforcement in place.
    Moreover, the installer lacks High Entropy ASLR, which allows the binary to consistently load into predictable memory ranges. This predictability increases the success rate of memory corruption exploits. When these two vulnerabilities are combined, they significantly lower the bar for successful supply-chain style attacks or privilege escalation through fake installers.

    Conceptual Example Code

    This is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. The malicious actor could potentially employ a shell command to generate a forged SHA-1 certificate and attach it to a malicious installer:

    # Generate SHA-1 hash for malicious installer
    echo -n "malicious_installer.exe" | openssl dgst -sha1 -binary | openssl enc -base64
    # Craft malicious installer with forged certificate
    copy /b malicious_installer.exe+fake_certificate.exe new_installer.exe

    Please note that this is a simplified and conceptual demonstration. In a real-world scenario, the process would likely involve more complex steps and tools, and the exploitation would require significant technical knowledge and resources.

    Mitigation Guidance

    Users are strongly advised to apply the vendor patch as soon as it becomes available. Until then, they should consider implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) as a temporary mitigation measure to reduce the risk of successful exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-26476: Unauthorized Access by Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key in Dell ECS and ObjectScale

    Overview

    This blog post provides a comprehensive analysis of the CVE-2025-26476 vulnerability, a hard-coded cryptographic key flaw found in specific versions of Dell ECS and ObjectScale software. This vulnerability is of significant concern as it allows an unauthenticated attacker with local access to potentially gain unauthorized access and compromise the system.
    The severity of this issue is underlined by its CVSS Severity Score of 8.4, indicating that it can cause significant damage if exploited. It’s pertinent for organizations using the affected versions of Dell ECS and ObjectScale to understand the risk this vulnerability poses and to take appropriate action to mitigate the potential impact.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-26476
    Severity: High (8.4 CVSS Score)
    Attack Vector: Local
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Unauthorized access leading to the potential system compromise or data leakage.

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Dell ECS | Prior to 3.8.1.5
    ObjectScale | Version 4.0.0.0

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability exists due to a hard-coded cryptographic key in the software, which can be exploited by an attacker with local access to the system. This hard-coded key can be used to bypass the system’s authorization procedures, allowing the attacker to gain unauthorized access to the system. Once access is gained, the attacker can perform unauthorized actions, leading to potential system compromise or data leakage.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Below is a conceptual example of how this vulnerability might be exploited. Keep in mind that this is a simplified representation and real-world exploits are likely to be more complex:

    #!/bin/bash
    # This script simulates the exploit of CVE-2025-26476
    # The attacker identifies the hardcoded key in the software
    hardcoded_key="hardcoded_key"
    # The attacker uses the hardcoded key to gain unauthorized access
    curl -X POST http://target-ip/vulnerable/endpoint -H "Authorization: Bearer $hardcoded_key"

    Mitigation Guidance

    To mitigate this vulnerability, it is recommended to apply the vendor patch as soon as possible. If the patch cannot be applied immediately, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) could serve as a temporary mitigation. These tools can monitor and block suspicious activities, thereby helping to prevent exploitation.
    However, it’s important to note that these are only temporary solutions. The hard-coded key vulnerability should be addressed at the earliest by updating to a secure version of the software that does not contain this vulnerability.

Ameeba Chat
Private by Nature

Amorphous. Adaptive. Resilient.

Ameeba Chat