Overview
CVE-2025-36525 is a high-severity vulnerability discovered in the BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) virtual server when configured to use a PingAccess profile. This vulnerability can lead to termination of the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM), potentially disrupting the service and possibly leading to system compromise or data leakage. This is a critical concern for organizations using the affected software versions, and an immediate patch is recommended.
Vulnerability Summary
CVE ID: CVE-2025-36525
Severity: High (7.5 CVSS Score)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage
Affected Products
Escape the Surveillance Era
Most apps won’t tell you the truth.
They’re part of the problem.
Phone numbers. Emails. Profiles. Logs.
It’s all fuel for surveillance.
Ameeba Chat gives you a way out.
- • No phone number
- • No email
- • No personal info
- • Anonymous aliases
- • End-to-end encrypted
Chat without a trace.
Product | Affected Versions
BIG-IP APM | All versions using a PingAccess profile
How the Exploit Works
The vulnerability arises from the handling of undisclosed requests by the BIG-IP APM when configured to use a PingAccess profile. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability by sending undisclosed requests to the server. These requests cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate, potentially disrupting the service, and opening the door for system compromise or data leakage.
Conceptual Example Code
Below is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This is a sample HTTP request, which simulates the undisclosed request that triggers the vulnerability.
POST /undisclosed/request HTTP/1.1
Host: vulnerable.example.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "malicious_request": "Undisclosed request causing TMM termination" }
Mitigation and Patching Guidance
The best mitigation against this vulnerability is to apply the patch provided by the vendor. If this is not immediately possible, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can serve as a temporary alternative for mitigating the risk associated with this vulnerability. However, these measures are not long-term solutions and should be complemented with the application of the vendor-provided patch as soon as it is feasible.

