Overview
In the evolving cybersecurity landscape, the CVE-2025-32310 vulnerability has emerged as a significant threat. This vulnerability is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) flaw found in ThemeMove QuickCal. If exploited, it allows unauthorized users to escalate their privileges on the system. This vulnerability primarily affects users of QuickCal up to and including version 1.0.13.
The gravity of this issue lies in its potential for system compromise and data leakage, which could lead to severe consequences such as data theft or loss, unauthorized system control, and potential damage to business reputation.
Vulnerability Summary
CVE ID: CVE-2025-32310
Severity: High (8.8 CVSS Score)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage
Affected Products
Escape the Surveillance Era
Most apps won’t tell you the truth.
They’re part of the problem.
Phone numbers. Emails. Profiles. Logs.
It’s all fuel for surveillance.
Ameeba Chat gives you a way out.
- • No phone number
- • No email
- • No personal info
- • Anonymous aliases
- • End-to-end encrypted
Chat without a trace.
Product | Affected Versions
ThemeMove QuickCal | up to and including 1.0.13
How the Exploit Works
The exploit takes advantage of the CSRF vulnerability in ThemeMove QuickCal. A CSRF attack occurs when an attacker tricks a victim into performing actions on their behalf on a web application in which they’re authenticated. In this case, the attacker could send a crafted request that, when executed, allows them to escalate privileges on the vulnerable system, leading to potential system compromise or data leakage.
Conceptual Example Code
For illustrative purposes, this example shows how an attacker might exploit the vulnerability using a malicious HTTP request:
POST /QuickCal/privilege-escalate HTTP/1.1
Host: vulnerable-site.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
user_id=attacker&new_role=adminIn this example, the attacker tricks the victim into sending a POST request that changes the user’s role to ‘admin’. The application, failing to validate the request’s origin, treats it as legitimate and grants the attacker administrative privileges.
Remember, this is a conceptual example and the actual exploit may vary based on the system’s configuration and the attacker’s approach.