Author: Ameeba

Overview

The CVE-2025-5305 vulnerability is a major cybersecurity risk that affects users of the Password Reset with Code for WordPress REST API WordPress plugin. This vulnerability stems from the plugin’s use of insecure algorithms to generate One-Time Password (OTP) codes, which could potentially lead to account takeovers. As WordPress powers over 40% of all websites on the internet, this vulnerability could put a significant number of users and businesses at risk, making it a high-priority issue for cybersecurity professionals and website administrators.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-5305
Severity: Critical, CVSS Score 9.8
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

Password Reset with Code for WordPress REST API WordPress plugin | Before 0.0.17

How the Exploit Works

The exploit targets the insecure OTP code generation process of the Password Reset with Code for WordPress REST API WordPress plugin. An attacker can predict or brute force the OTP code due to the use of weak algorithms, thereby gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. With this access, the attacker could alter system settings, steal sensitive data, or take complete control of the WordPress site.

Conceptual Example Code

Below is a conceptual example of how an attacker might exploit this vulnerability. This pseudocode outlines a brute force attack on the OTP code.

for potential_otp in all_possible_otps:
response = send_http_request(
method='POST',
url='https://target.example.com/wp-json/password-reset-with-code/v1/reset',
headers={'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
data={'username': 'victim', 'otp': potential_otp}
)
if response.status_code == 200:
print(f'Success! The OTP is {potential_otp}')
break

Please note that this is a simplified example and real-world attacks might involve more sophisticated techniques and obfuscation methods.
In the end, to mitigate this vulnerability, users should update the plugin to version 0.0.17 or later as soon as possible. If an update is not possible, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can offer temporary protection. However, these are only stop-gap measures and updating the plugin should be the priority.

Overview

The cybersecurity world is under constant threat from various sources. One such threat that has recently emerged is the vulnerability identified by CVE-2024-12367. This cybersecurity vulnerability affects the Vega Master software by Vegagrup, specifically versions v.1.12.35 through 20250916.
The issue lies in the software’s exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere. This vulnerability is especially concerning as it can lead to potential system compromise or data leakage, thereby posing a significant risk to users’ privacy and data integrity.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2024-12367
Severity: High (8.6 CVSS)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Impact: Potential system compromise and data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

Vega Master | v.1.12.35 through 20250916

How the Exploit Works

Due to a flaw in the Vega Master software, it allows directory indexing that exposes sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere. This flaw can be exploited over the network without requiring user interaction or privileges.
An attacker can take advantage of this vulnerability by making specific network requests to the affected software, thereby gaining access to sensitive system data which shouldn’t be accessible. This information can then be used to compromise the system or leak data.

Conceptual Example Code

A potential example of how the vulnerability might be exploited could look something like this:

GET /sensitive/directory HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com

In this example, the attacker sends a GET request to the `/sensitive/directory` endpoint of the target system. If the system is vulnerable, it would return sensitive system data that can be used for further malicious activities.
The vendor has not yet provided a fix for this vulnerability. However, as a temporary mitigation measure, users are advised to apply a vendor patch if available or use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) to protect against potential attacks exploiting this vulnerability.

Overview

The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) system has recently flagged a significant vulnerability, CVE-2025-59332, in the popular 3D viewer 3DAlloy for MediaWiki. This vulnerability specifically pertains to versions 1.0 through 1.8 and has a potential to compromise systems and leak sensitive data. Given the widespread use of 3DAlloy in the MediaWiki ecosystem, this vulnerability could potentially affect a large number of users, making it a matter of immediate concern for cybersecurity professionals and system administrators alike.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-59332
Severity: Critical (CVSS score: 8.6)
Attack Vector: Web
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Impact: System compromise and potential data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

3DAlloy for MediaWiki | 1.0 through 1.8

How the Exploit Works

The exploit leverages a flaw in the 3DAlloy’s 3D viewer for MediaWiki. Specifically, the `<3d>` parser tag and the `{{#3d}}` parser function allow users to provide custom attributes, which are then appended to the HTML canvas element output by the extension. The issue arises because these attributes are not sanitized, potentially allowing an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code. When this malicious code is executed, it can lead to severe consequences such as system compromise or data leakage.

Conceptual Example Code

Here is a conceptual example illustrating how the vulnerability might be exploited. In this case, the attacker sends a request with malicious JavaScript code as a custom attribute:

<3d custom_attribute="javascript:malicious_code()">

In this example, `malicious_code()` represents the attacker’s arbitrary JavaScript code. When the server processes this request, the malicious JavaScript code is executed, potentially leading to system compromise or data leakage.

Mitigation Guidance

It is advised to apply the vendor patch as soon as it is available. In the meantime, using a web application firewall (WAF) or an intrusion detection system (IDS) could serve as temporary mitigation. These tools can help detect and block malicious requests, providing a layer of protection against potential exploitation of this vulnerability.

Overview

In this piece, we delve into the intriguing world of cybersecurity vulnerabilities, focusing on a potent threat identified as CVE-2025-10205. The vulnerability, which affects ABB FLXEON up to and even beyond version 9.3.5, stems from the use of a one-way hash with a predictable salt. This particular issue is a significant concern for institutions using the ABB FLXEON, given the potential system compromise or data leakage that could result from its exploitation. Understanding such vulnerabilities is crucial in today’s digital age, where data integrity and system security are paramount.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-10205
Severity: High, CVSS score 8.8
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

ABB FLXEON | 9.3.5 and newer versions

How the Exploit Works

The vulnerability occurs due to the use of a predictable salt in a one-way hash function. In encryption, a salt is a piece of data that is used as an additional input to a one-way function that hashes data or password. The addition of the salt provides an extra layer of security. However, if the salt is predictable, it can be easily guessed by an attacker. This flaw enables an attacker to precompute the hash values using a rainbow table attack, significantly reducing the time it takes to crack the hashed values. Successful exploitation allows unauthorized disclosure of information, unauthorized modification, and disruption of service.

Conceptual Example Code

Below is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This is a sample HTTP request with a potentially malicious payload:

POST /login HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "username": "admin", "password_hash": "5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99", "salt": "1234" }

In this example, the attacker knows the predictable salt (“1234”) and the password hash. Using a rainbow table attack, they can reverse-engineer the hashed password (“5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99”), resulting in a potential system compromise.

Mitigation

The primary solution to this vulnerability is applying the vendor patch. In scenarios where this is not feasible, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can serve as temporary mitigation. It’s also important to review and restructure the password hashing mechanism to include a securely generated, random salt. This will significantly reduce the risk of an attacker successfully guessing the salt value.